Beckwith v. Frey: First Circuit Vacates Injunction Against Maine Waiting Period

On April 3, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that had blocked Maine's 72-hour waiting period for delivery of a purchased firearm.^[1] The panel concluded that the law was likely constitutional and remanded for further proceedings. It did not enter a final judgment resolving the entire case.

What the Court Decided

The appeal concerned whether the plaintiffs were likely to succeed and therefore entitled to preliminary relief. The panel reasoned that Maine's law regulates when a seller may deliver a purchased firearm and does not, on the record before it, infringe the textual right to keep and bear arms. Because the plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success, the court vacated the injunction.

What the Decision Does Not Decide

The opinion does not hold that every acquisition regulation is constitutional. It does not decide the final merits after a complete trial record, and it does not directly decide any Massachusetts statute or regulation. Its published legal reasoning is relevant within the First Circuit, but later proceedings or Supreme Court review could alter the litigation.

Supreme Court Status

The Supreme Court granted the applicants until August 31, 2026 to file a petition for a writ of certiorari.^[2] As of August 25, 2026, that deadline had not passed. An extension application is not a grant of Supreme Court review.

Massachusetts Relevance

Massachusetts is within the First Circuit, so the court's reasoning may be cited in federal cases involving acquisition or delivery restrictions. Any comparison must account for the text, operation, procedural posture, and evidentiary record of the Massachusetts provision at issue.