McDonald v. City of Chicago: Second Amendment Applies to the States
Two years after Heller established an individual right to keep and bear arms against federal action, the Supreme Court addressed whether that right also constrains state and local governments. On June 28, 2010, the Court answered yes in McDonald v. City of Chicago[1].
The Holding
In a 5-4 decision, the plurality opinion authored by Justice Alito held that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is incorporated against state and local governments through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment but argued incorporation should occur through the Privileges or Immunities Clause.
Direct Impact on Massachusetts
McDonald's incorporation of the Second Amendment meant that Massachusetts firearms laws were now subject to Second Amendment scrutiny. This opened the door for challenges to state-level regulations, including the licensing framework, assault weapons ban, and storage requirements. Every major Massachusetts firearms case since McDonald has been litigated under this framework.
Related
- Worman v. Healey: First Circuit Upholds AWB Under Pre-Bruen Framework
- NYSRPA v. Bruen: Supreme Court Establishes Historical Tradition Test
- Capen v. Campbell: First Circuit Upholds Massachusetts Assault Weapons Ban
- Commonwealth v. Thomson: Under-21 LTC Requirement Challenged at SJC
- Hanlon v. Campbell: NRA and GOAL Challenge Massachusetts Assault-Style Firearms Ban
- AG Healey's 2016 Enforcement Notice on Assault Weapons